Back from the beyond

Month: January 2003 (Page 1 of 6)

Post – January 31, 2003

Watched “Friends” for the first time in probably a whole season this week. (I’m not sure why. I haven’t been really entertained by the show in three years.) I was surprised at how old they all look, sort of like the college kids who hang out at the high school during breaks so they can relive their glory days.

The (freaky) exception was Courteney Cox, who seemed to have had some disturbing plastic surgery – or maybe it was just one too many chemical peels. She had this strange death’s-head sort of look about her, punctuated with giant protruding teeth. I was somewhat frightened – I’m sure not the reaction she was going for.

Post – January 30, 2003

“What has allowed so many psychopathic personalities to rise so high in corporations, and now in government, is that they are so decisive. Unlike normal people, they are never filled with doubts, for the simple reason that they cannot care what happens next. Simply can?t. Do this! Do that! Mobilize the reserves! Privatize the public schools! Attack Iraq! Cut health care! Tap everybody?s telephone! Cut taxes on the rich! Build a trillion-dollar missile shield!”

-Kurt Vonnegut, interviewed by In These Times

As a criminally indecisive person, I understand the havoc that the pathologically certain can have on people like me. It’s so much easier to just give in, and give up. Let’s not give up.

Post – January 28, 2003

Pronunciation guide

Was anyone else who watched the State of the Union completely distracted by GWB’s pronunciation? Mr. President:

-it’s PEN-IN-SOO-LA, not PEN-IN-SHOO-LA
-it’s TERROR, not TERRA
-and for the sake of all that’s good and holy, for the last time, it’s NOO-CLEE-UR, not NOO-KYU-LUR

Post – January 28, 2003

“If war is forced upon us…”

If the new criteria is we need to invade countries who may or may not have chemical and/or biological weapons that they may or may not give to terrorists they may or may not be associated with, since they can’t get them to us directly, we’re going to have to do a lot of invading.

“It is up to Iraq to show exactly where it is hiding its banned weapons…”

I’m sorry, but that’s funny. It’s the 2003 equivalent of “Senator, when did you stop beating your wife?”

Post – January 28, 2003

More Questions for the President

1. What exactly is this proof you have that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction? If you’re not going to show it to the American people, those U.N. inspectors would love to see it.

2. I hate to say this again, but why now? If we’ve managed to contain him for the last 10 years, why can’t we continue to do that? What exactly has pushed Saddam’s evil quotient through the roof?

3. If preemptive strike is the new U.S. foreign policy, who’s next? Just so we can mark our calendars. And why not bomb countries whose citizens have already attacked us, like Saudi Arabia?

4. Old business: How’s that Osama bin Laden search coming along?

5. What exactly, specifically, is your post-war plan for Iraq? If you’ve been planning what to do with all those oil fields, as in the link below, I’m sure you have other plans too. Let’s hear them.

Post – January 28, 2003

Fully loaded with a 1GHz PowerPC G4, 1MB of L3 cache, AirPort Card, Mega-wide display, Radeon graphics and a slot-loading SuperDrive, the 15-inch Titanium PowerBook G4 boasts jaw-dropping features ? including it?s price: all this is now just $2799.

-Apple web site

I know an apostrophe is a small thing. Small, but important. (And another reason why I love Arianna Huffington.)

« Older posts

© 2025 words mean things

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑