Watched the President give the first of six (!) planned speeches on the future of Iraq last night. It wasn’t carried by any of the networks, which I think doesn’t bode well with Bush getting his message (such as it is) out to the American public before the election.
As usual, he alternated between frightened and smirking. He always appears to me to have only the vaguest understanding of what he’s reading off the TelePrompter. But that’s just me, and we should judge a Presidential speech by its content, shouldn’t we? (Although I couldn’t help but think that Bush’s inability to pronounce “Abu Ghraib,” after all that’s happened, is sort of like Dick Cheney not being able to pronounce “Halliburton.”)
Based on content, the speech was an abject failure. “Stay the course,” when we don’t know what the course is, isn’t a plan. What does sovereignty mean when 130,000 – maybe more – American troops are roaming your country? What kind of legitimacy will an American and U.N.-picked government have? How come the handover is only a month away, and we still don’t know who we’re handing over to? When will American troops be coming home? So many questions with no answers.
I don’t know who I feel sorrier for: the Iraqis, or us.