Another great link stolen from lies.com:
Quick summary: Bush said he was invading because he “knew” there were massive weapons in Iraq threatening the U.S. and the world. Nothing was said about “liberating” Iraq, and in fact Bush expressly rejected “nation-building” in the 2000 campaign. If the weapons were destroyed or moved before the war, as the administration now alleges, why invade if the threat was gone? What proof is there that the weapons were destroyed?
I know I keep harping on this. But the only defense against The Big Lie is reminding ourselves, over and over, that it is one.
UPDATE: More of my ramblings on this subject on lies.com.
